|
Cox® Technic (aka flexion-distraction or F/D) relieves back and leg pain and neck and arm pain. Disc herniation
and/or stenosis may be the cause of pain. Or simple arthritis or a back sprain may be the culprit.
Cox® Technic is a gentle, non-surgical, chiropractic spinal manipulation adjustment technique procedure.
95% of back pain and neck pain patients DO NOT require surgery.
Cox® Technic is a safe alternative to back surgery. It is also appropriate for failed back surgery patients who
still suffer after surgery.
Cox® Technic is a well-researched (with research studies completed and underway), well-referenced (with over
90+ articles in medical and chiropractic journals) chiropractic spinal adjusting manipulation
Cox® Technic drops intradiscal pressures to -192 mmHg and increases the foraminal area by 28%.
Cox® Technic stops pain, realigns the spine and restores ranges of motion inherent to the spine while
reducing low back pain, especially in radiculopathy (extremity pain--leg pain or arm pain) patients, better than
active exercise therapy.
Innovated by James M. Cox, DC, DACBR, in the 1960's, Cox® Technic is a marriage of osteopathic and
chiropractic manipulation principles. It is an accepted and widely used form of spinal manipulation. Today, nearly
60% of chiropractic physicians report using it in their practices.
A select number of chiropractors have advanced their training via postgraduate courses. These "certified" Cox®
Technic chiropractic physicians are ready to help you.
Dr. Schmitt is trained in the Cox Technique. Ask if this may be right for you!
References 1. Dance A: For back pain sufferers, surgery isn't always the answer. LA Times January 12, 2009,
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/12/health/he-backpain12 accessed on 6/8/09
2. Chou, R; Atlas, SJ; Stanos, SP; Rosenquist, RW. Nonsurgical Interventional Therapies for Low Back Pain
A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. SPINE 2009; 34 (10):1078-1093 3. Chou, R; Baisden, J; Carragee, EJ; Resnick, DK; Shaffer, WO; Loeser, JD Surgery for Low Back Pain A Review of the
Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. SPINE 34 (10). MAY 1 2009. p.1094-1109 4. Chou, R; Loeser, JD; Owens, DK; Rosenquist, RW; Atlas, SJ; Baisden, J; Carragee, EJ; Grabois, M; Murphy, DR; Resnick,
DK; Stanos, SP; Shaffer, WO; Wall, EM: Interventional Therapies, Surgery, and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Low Back
Pain An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society. SPINE 2009; 34 (10):1066-1077
5. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Su YA et al: Long term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spine stenosis:
8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2005;30(8):936-43 6. Atlas S, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE: Long term outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of sciatica
secondary to lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2005; 30(8):927-35 7. Deyo R: Annals of Internal Medicine 112(8) 8. Frymoyer: Backletter 10(7) 9. RAND Study: Journal of Chiropractic 29(11) 10. ACHPR (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research) - a federal government research organization - Clinical Practice
Guideline No.14. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health
Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, December, 1994. 11. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00329 accessed on 6/8/09, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
website, "Lumbar Spinal Stensosis"
12. Murphy DR, Hurwizt EL, Gregory AA, CLary R: A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis
: a prospective obsercational cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006; 7:NIL1-NIL8 (February 23, 2006)
|